BS”D
אִם־מָצָאתִי חֵן בְּעֵינֶיךָ הַמֶּלֶךְ … תִּנָּתֶן־לִי נַפְשִׁי בִּשְׁאֵלָתִי
וְעַמִּי בְּבַקָּשָׁתִי
It is with a feeling similar to that expressed in the above posuk that I write these words. I believe that this article, (and its continuations) are some of the most important articles I have written here. I request that even if you would normally have dismissed such information out of hand, you stop and consider it carefully, because I am speaking from much tragic experience, and I mean every word with all my heart.
וְכֵן תַּעֲשֶׂה לְכָל־אֲבֵדַת אָחִיךָ אֲשֶׁר־תֹּאבַד מִמֶּנּוּ וּמְצָאתָהּ לֹא תוּכַל לְהִתְעַלֵּם
When we are aware of critical information which someone does not have, we cannot turn away and pretend all is well. We have a chiyuv to try to help. All the more so, as we discuss the very lives of Klal Yisrael.
We have spent many articles discussing the spiritual infiltration into our communities, but we have only briefly hinted at the physical dangers we face. It is my hope that once you have come to recognize that there are many who want to tear us down spiritually, you will be able to see that the same is true with our health, and that of our precious children, the future of our nation. This hakara is critical now, as the sakana grows ever stronger. Fortunately, the danger is also more obvious than ever.
You may be one of those who got a covid vaccine because you were worried about your own safety, or your job required it, or you were made to believe it was the correct choice for other reasons. You may be one of the many who refrained from boosters after realizing that quite a few people were experiencing problems after the shots, which weren’t working as promised anyway. Or, perhaps you were fortunate enough to not have taken the vaccine at all.
No matter which category you belong to, you are probably already aware that the vaccine hasn’t protected against covid, and you might know that there are a tremendous amount of tzaros now being experienced by many who took it.
If you aren’t yet aware of these things, (and also if you are), this article will be very informative and important for you to read.
As a member of the Heimishe community, you are likely to agree that children have no need of covid vaccines. In our closely connected world, we know what goes on, and we all are aware that Baruch Hashem, children simply do not die of covid.
Then why is it, davka now, as the world is exploding with revelations of the deaths, disabilities, and infertility caused by the shots, that the CDC and New Jersey Department of Health are heavily promoting those same ineffective and dangerous vaccines to the children of the frum community?
That’s correct! With the help of Heimish talent, askanim, “frum” publications, and rogue “community organizations,” who enable them to finely tailor their messaging to appeal to and reach deep into our communities, the CDC and the New Jersey Department of Health are pushing the covid vaccine onto our children.
In fact, for possibly the first time, medical products are being shamelessly advertised directly to children, with prizes attached.
We all know that our children are not endangered by covid, but what are the effects of the covid vaccine?
I can tell you.
How many calls and messages have I received constantly for the last two years with fresh tragedies and troubles, the likes of which we never heard before, with most of the victims known to be covid vaccinated? It is impossible to keep track because of the sheer volume, Rachmana litzlan. Here is the list from just the past week, and only the ones that are confirmed vaccinated. I have hidden identifying details to protect privacy.
A young healthy person who was “forced” to vax for work, now in desperate need of an organ transplant.
A teenager, vaxxed and boosted, with symptoms of heart trouble.
A bochur, vaxxed and boosted, with a brain bleed.
A woman who took only one shot, still experiencing pain two years later, which no doctor can help.
A young mother with a little baby; the mother is vaxxed and boosted, and now can hardly walk.
A young man who took three shots, suffering from such severe nosebleeds that he required blood transfusions.
A couple, the wife took one shot, unable to conceive.
Another couple, the wife took one shot, hasn’t had any more children since.
Another couple, the wife had taken one shot, had a miscarriage.
Another couple, the husband had taken one shot, the wife finally became pregnant again after a long wait, and miscarried.
The most striking types of tzaros in their newness are the young people suddenly dying, the young people with heart attacks and brain bleeds, and the sudden turbo cancers - one day the person is fine, the next day they discover that aggressive cancer is all over their body. And the young men who can no longer perform the Mitzva. The women bleeding for months on end. And the stillbirths - so many stillbirths and miscarriages. Rachmana Litzlan.
All of the adverse events above are known effects of the covid shots, scientifically documented, with the causative mechanism understood - and are exactly what the brave scientists and doctors who understood the technology of the new shots warned would happen, two years ago.
We were not dealing with this - not on this scope - before 2021.
Hashem yeracheim, every day has been bringing fresh tzaros. Often I am contacted for help, and other times I simply receive a message to daven, or a notice of a korban that has already ascended to shamayim, Rachmana Litzlan. When will it end?
We are told that children always used to have heart attacks, that healthy or relatively healthy people always used to suddenly drop dead in the street, the bathroom, the airport, in restaurants and on ball fields, without warning. But that isn’t true. Chapels say that they very rarely got calls to pick up a meis from a home death before the covid-19 vaccine, and when they did, it was usually for a hospice patient. Now, it’s all the time. It’s actually an open Halacha that we are NOT choishesh for sudden death, because it is NOT a common occurrence.
The first Mishna in Yuma says that you don’t have to prepare a second wife for the Kohein Gadol for Yom Kippur, to be ready in case his wife dies (he cannot do the Avoda unless he’s married) since מיתה לא שכיחא.
The obvious question is that unfortunately death is not uncommon. The Rambam in the Peirush HaMishnayos explains there that SUDDEN death is not common.
But NOW IT IS.
And now, our children are being openly targeted to receive this nightmarish injection, with the help of our own community insiders. It should make your blood boil.
Is everything truly all about money? Do we snap, clap, and march at the government’s word, for the money they dole out? Or do we investigate the truth deeply for ourselves and do what is actually in our children’s best interests?
If you contemplate this sugya, you will realize that it is the exact same story as the government infiltration into our chinuch - do what we say, and we pay you. It means that we have sold ourselves and allowed them control of our guf and neshama.
Here is a picture from the CDC campaign video, which is attached later on.
Unfortunately, they included in the campaign material a quote from a Talmid Chochom which did not seem to be al pi Torah, and I checked with my Rav, who confirmed that it is, indeed, kefira:
“I remember polio when I was a child. These diseases didn’t go away because someone wrote a kamayah. Vaccines took away these diseases.”
The “Duvi and Rochel” campaign was very clever in not referencing the covid vaccine explicitly in most of their materials, as they realized that the majority of Heimishe people don’t see the need for it. Instead, they worked hard with robocalls, a hotline, a catchy video in Yiddish and English, prizes, and a raffle to just get the children into the doctor’s office.
“Hey kids! Get our coloring book at your doctor’s office and enter to win $100 at (toy store)!”
(The excuse for the campaign to run to the doctor for shots is, of course, the dreaded polio. Polio, which is long gone, Baruch Hashem, except in countries which still use the live polio vaccine. As even their own campaign video says, “when Bubby’s Bubby was a little girl…” Yes, the Health Department did their best to create an epidemic of fear around an unconfirmed Rockland County case last summer, and they are still using that one “case” to drive kids into doctors’ offices.
You may be interested to know that I spoke to that “polio victim’s” mother at length, and the circumstances around his “diagnosis” were highly suspect (he actually received two conflicting diagnoses, and when questioned, the medical professional and askanim involved started behaving very strangely.) It was quite obvious that the government was desperate to have a case in order to push vaccination rates, and the professionals who had relationships with the Health Department were afraid to go up against them.
It is very noteworthy that the young man’s entire large family (who were unvaccinated) remained healthy, never catching anything from him. He himself was B”H doing much better, the last time I spoke to his mother.
In fact, since the polio hype from Eretz Yisrael is now starting again, I should mention that exactly one year ago, the Israeli government attempted to start a fake “polio epidemic” there. I spoke afterwards to the mothers of both “victims.” The little girl in Meah She’arim may indeed have had polio (caught from a classmate’s live polio vaccine shedding), but the second “case” was a complete and total sham, engineered to create fear. It fizzled out when the mother of this healthy child caught on, got a lawyer, and demanded to see her daughter’s lab results.
Since now the US government is telling everyone that they should get the polio vaccine before coming to Eretz Yisrael for Pesach, claiming that there are currently several polio cases in Tzfas, I spoke to Rav Uri Sofer in Bnei Brak, and he explained to me what is actually going on. There is ONE child in Tzfas who has paralysis of unknown origin - perhaps Guilliane Barre - and as is their custom, the government is propagandizing it, claiming that the child has polio and that 5 other children who were exposed to him have it, as well. In actuality, the other five are perfectly healthy. Additionally, Rav Sofer mentioned the three causes of “polio” paralysis as concluded by a large group of investigative scientists - among them, chemical poisoning, and told me that the cure is high dose Vitamin C and Vitamin D, plus zinc and magnesium - which sadly, the child in Tzfas is not being given. He also related that after the Israeli government’s last polio vaccination campaign half a year ago (using the dangerous live oral vaccine), almost 70 children in Eretz Yisrael were left paralyzed - according to a letter from the Misrad Habriut to the WHO, which listed the children by name.)
Back to our original topic - once at the doctor’s office, uneducated parents are at risk of persuasion to give their child the covid vaccine, as many pediatricians offer (and encourage) children’s covid shots.
While Shoshana Bernstein claimed that she was not promoting the covid vaccine to the children of our community, and this bit of the video was later removed, the proof is right here that she was, in fact, doing so.
As you’ll see in the video attached below, at about the 3 minute mark the pitch for the covid vaccine is casually inserted by cartoon character Duvi.
The following advertisement by the New Jersey Health Department which appeared in a range of frum publications is much more explicit. It was followed by different advertisements each week targeting our population.
It is truly a wonder to me that the publishers agree to run these ads. No children in our communities have died of covid (because children do not die of covid, period) and everyone knows this.
You likely do know someone who died from the covid vaccine, though. More than 1 in 4 Americans believe they do, according to a recent Rasmussen poll - and we have much larger social networks than most Americans. https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/public_surveys/died_suddenly_more_than_1_in_4_think_someone_they_know_died_from_covid_19_vaccines
So how can frum people permit themselves to aid and abet the government in promoting this deadly substance to our children? How are frum pediatricians administering it?
Remember, this is the same CDC who is promoting transgenderism to children, which includes sterilization surgery, a lifetime dependency on very dangerous hormonal medications, and being unable to ever have children. This is a CDC with a woke, liberal, anti-Hashem, anti-life agenda. They are NOT interested in our communities’ children thriving and increasing.
And yet, frum people are working hand in hand with them. See these emails obtained under the Freedom of Information Act - correspondence between the director of the CDC, Rochelle Walensky, and Shoshana Bernstein (this is just a sample.)
They worked closely together to make the catchy video you saw above a reality, and get frum children into their pediatricians’ offices.
And remember - once children are in the doctor’s office for the “well” visit, too many pediatricians, frum ones included, will push for them to receive covid shots, and too many naive parents trustingly accept, (chas veshalom.)
It is truly incomprehensible that at this point in the game, as so many in our own backyards are suffering from all manner of tzaros from the shots, and the korbanos in “sudden deaths” pile up by the day, how anyone has the chutzpa or the heart to push this injection, and on children, no less.
If you have not yet made the connection between the covid vaccine and the tsunami of illnesses and deaths that Klal Yisrael (and the world) is facing, you may be wondering on what basis are we connecting the “safe” and “lifesaving” shot which “stopped the pandemic” to these tragedies.
Actually, the law in clinical trials is that any adverse effects that happen to patients in the trial are automatically attributed to the medical intervention being tested - unless proven otherwise. And yes, with the shots being only two years old, everyone taking them IS a participant in the largest long-term clinical trial in the world.
And no, the shots never went through the most basic testing which would normally be required, to check for their impact on fertility, on birth defects, and on their carcinogenic potential.
Here is one doctor’s list of some of the standard toxicology studies that were missing (there are more, though.) https://dailysceptic.org/why-werent-these-vaccines-put-through-the-proper-safety-trials-for-gene-technology-asks-a-former-pharmaceutical-research-scientist/
Most people just trusted, believing sincerely that the FDA had carefully tested the vaccines. But in truth, the FDA does NOT test ANY drugs or injections. They simply rely on the data given to them by the manufacturers, who hire private companies to run clinical trials. The entire process is rife with corruption, kickbacks, and fraud. For one example, the pharmaceutical companies pay much of the FDA’s budget, and pay royalties to the NIH:
https://frontline.news/post/fda-under-the-influence
This has been going on for decades, as documented in countless sources, such as the book Overdosed America, but the covid shot coup takes the cake in its sheer chutzpa, worldwide scope, and the immeasurable amount of human suffering it has caused.
You may be thinking of the close relationship you have with your doctor, who might even daven in your shul. You know he wouldn’t want to harm you.
It is very possible that if your caring family doctor strongly recommended that you get the covid vaccine, he truly was convinced that it was safe, effective, and important.
Why was he so misinformed? There are several pieces to the puzzle.
1. The doctors’ deep trust of the medical establishment, CDC, FDA, medical journals, and the data they are presented with by the pharmaceutical companies. It is fair to say that they have been trained not to think critically.
To understand the deep and almost total control that the pharmaceutical companies wield over doctors’ thinking, here are some quotes from “Overdo$ed America” by Dr. John Abramson, MD, published in 2004. (The corruption had begun in earnest a number of years before he wrote the book, and it has only become exponentially worse since then. Keep in mind, as you read the grave warnings he quoted 19 years ago from editors of medical journals, that at this point (2023), the medical journals themselves have become so corrupted (captured by pharmaceutical company payments) that they would never issue such statements now.)
THE COMMERCIAL TAKEOVER OF MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE
From their first day of training, medical students are taught to trust the research published in peer-reviewed medical journals. They learn to take for granted that publication of research findings in these journals ensures that the principles of rigorous science have been followed: that the research has been properly designed to answer the question in a way that can be translated into clinical practice; that the data have been analyzed fairly and completely; that the conclusions drawn are justified by the research findings; and that the scientific evidence that has been published constitutes our best medical knowledge. This medical literature then serves as the source that enables doctors to keep current with new developments in medicine.
In September 2001 an unprecedented alarm was sounded. The editors of 12 of the world’s most influential medical journals, including the Journal of the American Medical Association, the New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, and the Annals of Internal Medicine, issued an extraordinary joint statement in their publications. In words that should have shaken the medical profession to its core, the statement told of “draconian terms” being being imposed on medical researchers by corporate sponsors. And it warned that the “precious objectivity” of the clinical studies that were being published in their journals was being threatened by the transformation of clinical research into a commercial activity.
The editors said that the use of commercially sponsored clinical trials “primarily for marketing… makes a mockery of clinical investigation and is a misuse of a powerful tool. Medical scientists working on corporate-sponsored research, the editors warned, “may have little to no input into trial design, no access to the raw data, and limited participation in data interpretation.”
Studies repeatedly document the bias in commercially sponsored research, but the medical journals seem powerless to control the scientific integrity of their own pages.
… in August of 2003 a study published in JAMA found that among the highest-quality clinical trials, the odds that those with commercial sponsorship will recommend the new drug are 5.3 times greater than for studies funded by nonprofit organizations. The authors noted that the lopsided results of commercially sponsored research may be “due to biased interpretation of trial results.” They cautioned that readers should “carefully evaluate whether conclusions in randomized trials are supported by data.” In other words, doctors are warned that the conclusions of even the best research published in the best journals cannot be taken at face value.
This is the sorry state of the “scientific evidence” on which medical practice is based in the United States today.
(My note: Remember - this is exactly our situation with the covid shots - Pfizer ran their own trials, through privately hired research firms.)
Although many doctors have a gut feeling that there is a pro-industry bias in the scientific evidence that guides their care, almost all of the information that comes their way, including the opinions of the experts they trust, reinforces the validity of this “knowledge.” Plus, the findings are made to appear so overwhelmingly compelling and contain such enormous hope to provide ever more effective care to their patients that it is hard not to be a believer. There is a magical quality to all this progress that causes us to suspend our better judgment and seduces us into believing that what we are hearing and seeing is really true.
KEEPING THE REAL DATA HIDDEN
Often the medical researchers who carry out company-sponsored studies are not even allowed to see all of the data from the studies they are working on. These researchers are left in the position of analyzing and including in their articles only the data that the drug or device manufacturers have allowed them to see. In May 2000, Dr. Thomas Bodenheimer brought many of these issues to light in an important article in the New England Journal of Medicine titled “Uneasy Alliance: Clinical Investigators and the Pharmaceutical Industry.” One researcher quoted in the article explained that controlling access to the data allows drug companies to “provide the spin on the data that favors them.”
The September 2001 joint statement issued by the editors of major medical journals weighed in heavily on this important issue: “we strongly oppose contractual agreements that deny investigators the right to examine the data independently.. . . Such arrangements not only erode the fabric of intellectual inquiry that has fostered so much high-quality clinical research, but also make medical journals party to potential misrepresentation.” Practicing doctors count on the articles in medical journals to present and interpret the complete data, thus providing the “scientific evidence” that they trust to guide their patient care decisions. If even the researchers who write the articles have access to only the data that the corporate sponsors allow them to see, how can anyone have confidence in the “scientific evidence” published in the medical journals? And how can anyone have confidence in the medical care that is based upon results that have been censored to serve commercial interests?
Before any medical article is accepted for publication in a respectable journal, it is peer-reviewed. Independent experts are called upon to evaluate the study’s data, and to concur (or not) with the authors’ analyses and conclusions. Most doctors believe that this peer-review process guarantees the integrity and completeness of the scientific evidence presented. But peer reviewers see only the data that have been included in the article—not all of the data the authors had access to and certainly not all of the data from the study. Readers of medical journals cannot assume that the process of peer review ensures fair and impartial presentation of research results.
According to the editor of the British Medical Journal, Dr. Richard Smith, “The major journals try to counterbalance the might of the pharmaceutical industry, but it is an unequal battle—not least because journals themselves profit from publishing studies funded by the industry.”
The journals benefit from the publicity gained from publishing large drug company–sponsored studies. This increases the value of their advertising and enables them to sell back to the drug companies reprints of articles, which the drug companies then distribute as marketing tools to doctors.
At the same time that medical journals are given incentives to please the drug companies, they are also given strong disincentives to go against drug company interests. According to Dr. Marcia Angell, former editor of NEJM, editors of medical journals exercise self-censorship—trying to avoid offending their chief advertisers, the drug companies.
Dr. Robert Fletcher learned about this firsthand. In 1992, he was editor of the Annals of Internal Medicine when it published an article reporting that 44 percent of the drug ads in medical journals were written in a way that would lead doctors with no other source of information to prescribe improperly. The article also reported that 92 percent of these ads were in some violation of FDA rules. Writing in The Lancet in 2003, Dr. Fletcher said that as punishment for publishing this article, the pharmaceutical industry “withdrew many adverts” and showed that it was “willing to flex its considerable muscles when it felt its interests were threatened.”
COMMERCIALIZING DOCTORS’ CONTINUING EDUCATION
Virtually all doctors keep abreast of developments in their field by regularly attending educational lectures and courses. For most doctors this is mandatory; participation in continuing medical education (CME) is required to maintain their state medical licenses. Lectures and conferences about the latest breakthroughs and state-of-the-art care are presented by experts with impressive academic credentials and are often held at prestigious academic medical centers.
Commercial support for doctors’ continuing education courses has been increasing at a rapid clip, doubling between 1996 and 2000. The medical industry (and in particular the drug companies) funded more than three-fifths of doctors’ continuing education in 2001.
By 2003, the drug companies were spending more than $1500 per year on CME for every doctor in the United States, funding 70 percent of all continuing education for doctors.
Besides the talks and formal lectures, drug companies also work hard to draw doctors into an environment where they are predisposed to be agreeable—be it a convenient lunch or a luxury resort. In an article published in the American Journal of Bioethics titled “All Gifts Large and Small: Toward an Understanding of the Ethics of Pharmaceutical Industry Gift Giving,” the authors point out that “food, flattery, and friendship are all powerful tools of persuasion, particularly when combined.”
Does it work? The evidence is quite clear. Notwithstanding doctors’ steadfast belief in their resistance to commercial pressure, the drug companies know better: doctors who attend sponsored lectures significantly increase their prescribing of the sponsor’s drug. A study followed the prescribing habits of 20 doctors who attended CME seminars sponsored by the manufacturers of two different drugs. Though all but one doctor denied that attendance at the seminars had affected their prescribing habits, all but one of the doctors increased their use of the two drugs in comparison with other doctors at their institutions and in comparison with the national average. Clearly, the doctors had been influenced by education sponsored by drug companies, and it was all the more effective because they naively believed themselves impervious to such influence.
There seems to be no end to the medical industry’s influence over CME. Nearly half of the members of the task force that establishes the guidelines for drug industry involvement with CME are directly employed by the drug companies or are their paid consultants.
Anyone who has spent any time in a doctor’s office will have noticed the constant parade of … well-dressed drug company sales representatives giving away trinkets to the staff and trying .. to get a moment of the doctor’s time. The number of reps making sales pitches in doctors’ offices has tripled over the past 10 years. There is now one full- time drug rep for every four and a half office-based doctors. In 2001, drug companies spent $4.7 billion “detailing” (“industry speak” for drug reps’ sales calls) to the 490,000 office-based doctors in the United States.
You may wonder why 80 to 90 percent of doctors—with all their training and clinical experience—are willing to listen to drug reps at all. Moreover, you may wonder how self-respecting doctors could possibly allow themselves to be influenced by the sales pitches from people with so much less understanding of the complexities and pitfalls of medical practice, and with such obvious commercial motives. The drug reps provide what can seem to busy doctors like a useful service. Along with their trinkets, doughnuts, and free lunches, they arrive with reprints of articles from medical journals and the drug company’s own educational materials summarizing the latest medical research. Like CliffsNotes, the drug reps provide doctors with easy-to-read versions of the latest research (that supports their product), allowing the doctors to feel up to date.
How accurate is this so-called educational material? According to an article in the Journal of General Internal Medicine published in 1996, 42 percent of the material given to doctors by drug reps made claims that were in violation of FDA regulations, and only 39 percent of the material provided scientific evidence to support its marketing claims.
Most doctors firmly believe that their opinions about drugs and scientific evidence are not compromised by these interactions. The research shows otherwise. A review of doctor–drug company interactions, published in JAMA, shows that these interactions have a mostly negative effect on the quality of medical care.
DICTATING DOCTORS’ ORDERS
Recognizing that no doctor can keep up with the deluge of medical research about all of the different clinical conditions, the medical profession regularly develops clinical practice guidelines to establish the standards that define good medical care. These guidelines are created by panels of nationally recognized clinical experts, and are usually sponsored by nonprofit organizations (such as the American Heart Association, the National Osteoporosis Foundation, or the National Stroke Association), professional societies (such as the American Colleges of Gastroenterology, Psychiatry, or Rheumatology), or governmental agencies.
Clinical guidelines provide expert review of the research and allow doctors to be confident that their decisions regarding patient care reflect the best available scientific evidence. Guidelines also provide benchmarks by which the quality of a doctor’s care can be evaluated, and (always lurking in the background of a doctor’s thoughts) they are admissible as evidence of the accepted standards of care in medical malpractice cases.
…in 2002, JAMA published the most damning study of all. The study found that four out of five experts who participate in the formulation of clinical practice guidelines have financial relationships with drug companies, averaging more than 10 such relationships each. A whopping 59 percent of the experts “had relationships with companies whose drugs were considered in the guideline they authored.” This would be the equivalent of a judge’s having an ongoing financial relationship with one of the litigants in a case he was hearing, or a stockbroker’s recommending his uncle’s IPO. More than half of the guidelines examined in the JAMA study had not even established a formal process for declaring participants’ relationships with drug companies.
The picture that emerges is so contrary to the faith that we doctors place in the process of how medical science gets translated into clinical practice that it may be hard for most doctors to believe. But it’s true: the majority of participants in the formulation of clinical guidelines have active financial relationships with companies manufacturing the very drugs that are being decided upon.
There is so much more fascinating and eye-opening information in Overdosed America. The author, Dr. Abramson, actually stopped practicing in order to do the research and write this book, because he was so disturbed by what he saw happening.
If you want the PDF of the book, you can email me, or you can order the book on Amazon if you have access to do so. It is very worthwhile.
This link also has great information on the topic: https://frontline.news/post/doctors-under-the-influence
After reading about how the pharmaceutical companies exert such strong mind control over doctors, you can better understand how the covid vaccine debacle came to be.
But there is more. It wasn’t just that the doctors trusted the medical establishment and pharma, which misled them badly.
2. In what is certainly the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on humanity, the WHO, media and governments worked in lockstep with the medical establishment to censor and suppress information on the effective and safe treatments for covid, the dangers of the vaccine, and on the tragedies resulting from the shots.
Not only that, but they purposefully caused a huge public antagonism towards anyone who attempted to offer information that differed from the set narrative.
(In fact, those scientists and doctors who publicly voiced grave concerns about the safety of the vaccines frequently had their careers destroyed. No wonder, then, that others felt too afraid to openly speak up. For example, someone I talked with recently has three doctors in their Heimishe neighborhood who all quietly tell people they know not to get the covid vaccine.)
There is a truly strange, highly unusual, and anti-scientific situation that we are living through, in which the public health officials and doctors who promote the covid vaccine consistently refuse to have an honest, open scientific conversation with those warning that it poses severe dangers. It would only make sense to openly debate the science, so the public could hear each side and and be able to make an informed decision, but that doesn’t happen. No matter how many times they were invited, those supporting the vaccine refuse to show up to defend their position.
In the layman’s realm, as well, information-sharing and discussion was stifled, as relatives and friends would often react in anger to anyone to tried to present data advising against the shots. I cannot recall ever experiencing anything similar.
We all know that the truth is arrived at through discussion and debate. Imagine, for comparison, that someone claimed that his pshat in a Gemara was so definitely right, and all the others were so devoid of merit, that he would refuse to even enter into discussion about it, and would get angry if you so much as tried to challenge his reasoning. You would lose all respect for him. He’d be chutz lamachane; nobody would go along with his mehalech. And yet, this is the equivalent of what has been foisted upon the world.
3. Doctors were tricked into believing that almost every hospitalized covid patient was unvaccinated. This caused them to believe that the vaccines worked and were safe, and to feel anger towards the unvaccinated. But it was false.
How was this subterfuge accomplished? Dr. Pierre Kory MD discovered how staff in many hospitals had been instructed to document incoming patients’ vax status. If the person had not been vaccinated within that very same medical system, they would be marked as “unknown vaccine status,” even if they had their vaccine card with them. By this classification of vaccinated patients’ status as “unknown,” which then automatically turned into “unvaccinated,” the doctors in the hospitals were tricked into believing (incorrectly) that the majority of hospital/ICU patients were actually unvaxxed, and that those were the people getting very ill.
Be’ezras Hashem, we will present in Part 2 the overwhelming evidence showing that the unprecedented sudden deaths, blood clots, heart attacks, pregnancy loss, and more, that world now faces is a direct result of the covid shots, and that the true numbers of dead are mind-boggling. Additionally, we will show that the shots never saved any lives in any age groups, but only resulted in suffering and increased mortality rates.
If we don’t wake up now and stop the carnage, what will be?
Note: My intent is not to panic you if you have been vaccinated, but to educate you so that you don’t get any more boosters, nor give them to your children. B’chasdei Hashem, great advances are bring made in developing products to help those who are injured, and for those who currently feel well, to take in order to hopefully avoid harm. Be’ezras Hashem, I’ll try to write about that also, in the near future.